RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 1996;7:117-122
doi:10.1258/0956462961917311
© 1996 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Duynhoven, Y. T. H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Katchaki, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Laboratory-based HIV surveillance with information on exposure: importance of discriminating person-based from test-based results

Y. T. H. P. van Duynhoven, H. Houweling, L. G. Wiessing, M. I. Esveld, H. L. J. Nieste and J. N. Katchaki

Within a surveillance programme in a Regional Public Health Laboratory anonym ous information on HIV test, requesting physician and tested individual is automatically selected, regardless of test result. Thereby, personal identifiers are transformed into unique but meaningless num eric codes. Besides, requesting physicians receive a questionnaire on indication for testing (response 87%). Between April 1989 and June 1993 12,219 HIV tests were performed in 10,972 individuals. The percentage of positive tests (2.1%) was twice the percentage of positive individuals (1%). No increase in num ber of new infections was observed over tim e. Of individuals, 41.6% were tested due to third party requests (mainly insurance): HIV was demonstrated once (0.03%). Among the rem ainder, with medical indications, seroprevalence was 1.4%. At relatively little expense, we were able to provide valid information about patterns of HIV-testing and HIV seroprevalences am ong people tested in routine medical practice. Prevention of double counts proved to be important. Extension to other Dutch areas is expected.

Key Words: SURVEILLANCE • SEROPREVALENCE • EXPOSURE CATEGORY


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Walking London's Medical History