RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2009;20:571-572
doi:10.1258/ijsa.2008.008472
© 2009 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenvinge, M M
Right arrow Articles by Lau, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Audit reports

Screening for asymptomatic chlamydia in women – how often would gonorrhoea be missed?

M M Rosenvinge MRCP  and R Lau MD FRCP

St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK

Correspondence to: Dr M M Rosenvinge, Courtyard Clinic, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0QT, UK Email: melrosenvinge{at}hotmail.com

Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) to azithromycin is increasing. The dose of azithromycin used for treating uncomplicated genital chlamydia may be subtherapeutic for GC and contribute to gonococcal resistance. The National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) does not routinely screen for GC but advises further testing of clients with symptoms. This will miss asymptomatic cases. We conducted a case-note review of 100 women aged 16–24 years diagnosed with chlamydia and women aged 16–24 years co-infected with GC and chlamydia, who attended a London genitourinary clinic from 1 October 2004 to 30 September 2005. There were 559 chlamydia diagnoses; 38 (7%) were co-infected with GC. Those co-infected were younger: mean age 18.9 versus 20.3 (P = 0.005). They were also more likely to have symptoms: 28/38 (74%) versus 50/94 (53%) (P = 0.03). Two of 10 women with asymptomatic GC were contacts; meaning that eight cases of asymptomatic GC would have received subtherapeutic treatment. In conclusion, additional testing for GC should be considered in local NCSP protocols where there is a high prevalence of both infections.

Key Words: gonorrhoea • chlamydia (National Chlamydia Screening Programme) • co-infection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J STD AIDSHome page
M Mahto, S J Lavelle, and H Mallinson
Screening for asymptomatic chlamydia in women: How often would gonorrhoea be missed?
Int J STD AIDS, February 1, 2010; 21(2): 149 - 150.
[Full Text] [PDF]