International Journal of STD & AIDS > Volume 20, Number 7 > Pp. 470-472

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Howe, B E C Articles by Clutterbuck, D PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original research articles

Targeting of HIV pretest discussion and risk-reduction interventions in a low-prevalence setting

B E C Howe BSc MBChB and D Clutterbuck FRCP MRCGP 

Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Level 1, Lauriston Building, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, UK

Correspondence to: Dr D Clutterbuck, Department of Genitourinary Medicine, NHS Lothian University Hospitals Division, Level 1, Lauriston Building, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, UK Email: Dan.Clutterbuck{at}luht.scot.nhs.uk

Genitourinary medicine clinic attendees who were newly diagnosed as HIV antibody positive in a population with low overall HIV prevalence were compared with HIV–ve control groups in a retrospective study. Demographics and clinical data from the clinic attendance at which the HIV test was performed were analysed. Of 25,627 HIV tests, 113 were positive. Seventy-eight percent had an identified risk factor for HIV and more than half had symptoms of, or were contacts of, a sexually transmitted infection (STI) or HIV. Only eight clients testing HIV+ve had attended for routine STI testing and only two of these had no identified risk factor. Groups shown to be at higher HIV risk included attendees with past history of STI, men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) and those requesting HIV test without an STI screen. MSM testing HIV–ve had high rates of HIV risk behaviour.

Key Words: HIV • diagnosis • high-risk behaviour • prevention • epidemiology

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?