International Journal of STD & AIDS > Volume 20, Number 3 > Pp. 196-199

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Menon-Johansson, A S Articles by Ward, H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original research articles

Surveillance of an infectious syphilis outbreak in south London, UK: a comparison of reporting systems

A S Menon-Johansson MRCP MPH  ^*, Y Young FFPH , H Maguire FFPH , P Trail MSc  and H Ward FFPHM ^**

^* Stephen's Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH; South West London Health Protection Unit; Regional Epidemiology Unit and St George's Hospital Medical School; Regional Epidemiology Unit, PA; ^** Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Anatole S Menon-Johansson Email: a.menon-johansson{at}nhs.net

Rising heterosexual syphilis in south London in 2002 prompted Local Enhanced Syphilis Surveillance (LESS) in five of the 10 genitourinary medicine clinics. LESS reported a fall in heterosexual infectious syphilis in 2004 that was corroborated by the National Enhanced Syphilis Surveillance (NESS). However, mandatory clinic Korner Codes 60 (KC60) coding did not support the reported fall; therefore database discrepancies were evaluated. Three databases (KC60, NESS and LESS) were compared in 2004 at selected clinics using clinical notes as the reference. Six clinics participated in NESS. Four clinics participated in both LESS and NESS and three of these clinics were visited. Only 48% (79 of 163) of KC60 infectious syphilis cases were heterosexual, 36% (58 of 163) were men who have sex with men and the rest were incorrectly coded. The NESS and LESS databases captured 80% and 68% of the confirmed heterosexual syphilis cases, respectively. Despite the inaccuracy in mandatory KC60 returns, this surveillance system captured additional heterosexual syphilis cases.

Key Words: syphilis • epidemiology/diagnosis • heterosexual

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?