Original research articles |



* Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, University of Nairobi, Kenya;
Department of Medicine;
Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Correspondence to: Dr D Matemo Email: daniel.matemo{at}uonbi.ac.ke
The sensitivity and specificity of rapid HIV-1 tests may be altered during pregnancy and postpartum. We conducted a study to determine the prevalence and correlates of false-positive Abbott DetermineTM and false-negative Uni-GoldTM rapid HIV-1 test results among antenatal and postnatal mothers attending a primary care clinic in Nairobi, Kenya. Mothers were tested for HIV-1 using Abbott DetermineTM and non-reactive results were considered HIV-1 antibody negative. Reactive samples by Determine were re-tested by Uni-GoldTM. Vironostika HIV-1 and Uni-FORM II Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to confirm samples that had positive Abbott DetermineTM and negative Uni-GoldTM. Among 2311 women who accepted HIV-1 testing, 1238 (54%) were tested antenatally and 1073 (46%) were tested postnatally. Of tested women, 274 (12%) women were reactive by Abbott DetermineTM and on retesting with Uni-GoldTM 30 (11%) had indeterminate results. The prevalence of indeterminate results was significantly higher in antenatal women than in postnatal women (2% versus 1%, P = 0.03). In conclusion, indeterminate rapid HIV-1 test results are more common in the antenatal period and appropriate safeguards to confirm HIV-1 infection status should be implemented in antenatal programmes.
Key Words: indeterminate HIV rapid ELISA test
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?