RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
This version was published on 1 November 2009
Int J STD AIDS 2009;20:768-770
doi:10.1258/ijsa.2009.009190
© 2009 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ijsa.2009.009190v1
20/11/768    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agha, K
Right arrow Articles by Patel, R
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original research articles

Pearly penile papules regress in older patients and with circumcision

K Agha *, S Alderson BA *, S Samraj MRCP {dagger}, A Cottam BM *, C Merry BM *, V Lee MRCP {dagger} and R Patel FRCP {dagger} 

* University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD; {dagger} Department of GUM and HIV, University of Southampton, Royal South Hants Hospital, St Mary's Road, Southampton SO14 OYG, Hampshire, UK

Correspondence to: Dr R Patel, Department of GUM and HIV, Royal South Hants Hospital, St Mary's Road, Southampton SO14 OYG, UK Emails: prj466{at}aol.com; km804{at}soton.ac.uk

This study assesses the prevalence and correlates of pearly penile papules (PPP) in two non-genitourinary (GU) medicine male cohorts (<25 and >50 years). PPP were categorised in 188 university students (<25 years), based on self-examination, and 70 patients (>50 years), based on clinician examination. PPP were categorised from 1 to 4, based on increasing papule size and distribution. An anonymous questionnaire was used to identify associations with PPP prevalence. The prevalence of PPP was 38.3% in <25 years, and 11.4% in >50 years (P < 0.001). The prevalence of categories 3 and 4 PPP was 8.5% in <25 years, and 1.4% in >50 years (P < 0.05). In the younger age group, the prevalence of PPP was 26.5% in circumcised participants, and 42.4% in uncircumcised participants (P < 0.05), but was unrelated to either frequency of sexual intercourse or time since first sexual intercourse. In conclusion, PPP disappear with age, and any PPP in patients >50 years are less marked than those in patients <25 years. Patients should be advised accordingly. PPP are less prevalent in circumcised men. Patients could be advised to wear the foreskin rolled back – this may maximize exposure of the coronal area to normal abrasion, which may hasten PPP regression.

Key Words: penile papules • circumcision


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MDU Exam Doctor