RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2008;19:437-440
doi:10.1258/ijsa.2008.008003
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shivasankar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Challenor, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original research articles

Patient-delivered partner therapy in the UK: what do the professionals think?

Sivapatham Shivasankar MRCP  and Rachel Challenor FRCP Edin DipGUM

Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Siva Shivasankar Email: Sivapatham.Shivasankar{at}phnt.swest.nhs.uk

The aim of this study was to investigate consultant genitourinary (GU) physicians' and health advisers' views regarding acceptability of patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) in the United Kingdom (UK). A postal questionnaire was sent to all consultant GU physicians and senior health advisers: 206 (65%) physician questionnaires and 153 (77%) health-adviser questionnaires were returned. One hundred and three (50%) physicians and 31 (22%) health advisers reported ever having used PDPT. Approximately one-third of professionals are strongly opposed to PDPT. However, the majority of both professional groups are cautiously prepared to consider PDPT, but only if there is no other option and only if a health professional first makes contact with the partner. Chief concern among health professionals is the legal status of PDPT in the UK. Here, the current General Medical Council (GMC) guidance on remote prescribing is helpful. The outcome of the Medical Research Council randomized controlled trial on accelerated partner therapy, which fits in with GMC guidance, is eagerly awaited as professionals would welcome evidence-based national guidance.

Key Words: patient-delivered partner therapy • PDPT • partner notification • health advisers • GU medicine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




History of the London Clinic

 RSM Books - Beyond Thalidomide George Guthrie