RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2008;19:217-221
doi:10.1258/ijsa.2007.007245
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bai, Z.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Gai, Q.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Review

Azithromycin vs. benzathine penicillin G for early syphilis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Zheng-Gang Bai MSc *, Ke-Hu Yang MSc * , Ya-Li Liu MSc *, Jin-Hui Tian MSc *, Bin Ma MSc *, Deng-Hai Mi MD {dagger}, Lei Jiang MSc {dagger}, Ji-Ying Tan MD * {ddagger} and Qiong-Yan Gai MB §

* Evidence-Based Medicine Centre of LanZhou University; {dagger} Second People's Hospital of GanSu Province; {ddagger} School of Basic Medical Sciences of LanZhou University; § Second Hospital of LanZhou University, LanZhou, Peoples Republic of China

Correspondence to: Professor Ke-Hu Yang, LanZhou University No. 199, Donggang Road, LanZhou 730000, Peoples Republic of China Email: yangkh{at}lzu.edu.cn

The World Health Organization estimates that at least 12 million people are infected with syphilis in the world. Southeast Asia accounts for 5.8 million; Africa accounts for 3.5 million. There has been controversy in using the two kinds of antibiotics for early syphilis. A systematic review comparing these antibiotics could affect treatment guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of azithromycin vs. penicillin G benzathine for early syphilis and a meta-analysis to compare these two kinds of antibiotics for early syphilis. Four randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria; 476 patients were evaluated for their cure rate. Cure rates were 95.0% (227/239) for azithromycin and 84.0% (199/237) for penicillin G benzathine. After pooling the data, the difference in efficacy was computed. Cure rate (OR = 1.37), 95% CI (1.05, 1.77) and the risk difference for cure rate between the two drugs were statistically significant. Although the gastrointestinal adverse effect of azithromycin is five times more than the adverse effect of penicillin G benzathine, the differences are not significant. Azithromycin achieved a higher cure rate than penicillin G benzathine in a long follow-up.

Key Words: azithromycin • penicillin G benzathine • syphilis • randomized clinical trial • meta-analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Units Symbols and Abbreviations Sixth edition