International Journal of STD & AIDS > Volume 19, Number 2 > Pp. 79-82

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carlin, E M Articles by Kellock, D J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES

Uptake of 48-hour access appointments in genitourinary medicine

E M Carlin FRCP  and D J Kellock FRCP

Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, King's Mill Hospital, Nottinghamshire, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Elizabeth Carlin, Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, King's Mill Hospital, Mansfield Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire NG17 4JL, UK Email: elizabeth.carlin{at}sfh-tr.nhs.uk

Timely access to genitourinary (GU) medicine services is important in the control of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). A target has been set that by March 2008, 100% of patients will be offered a GU medicine appointment within 48 hours. Strategic Health Authorities have also been asked to plan for 95% of patients to be seen within 48 hours. We sought to identify why patients decline appointments offered within 48 hours by collecting prospective data over three months. Additional data was collected over 18 working days to identify if alternative options would be acceptable to decliners. Overall, 1577 patients contacted the clinic, 1524 (96.6%) were offered a 48-hours appointment, 1108 (72.7%) accepted it, 416 (27.3%) declined it and 66.3% citing work commitments as the reason. In 118 patients, who declined the appointment offered; 43.2% indicated no alternative option was acceptable, 23.7% chose a Saturday appointment, which in 78.6% would have exceeded 48 hours. Hence, 73 (61.9%) patients would not have accepted an appointment within 48 hours. The balance of public health control, mixed service provision and informed patient choice is discussed.

Key Words: genitourinary medicine • access • 48 hours • targets • STIs

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N M Steedman, V Worsnop, and R Fernie Acceptance of genitourinary medicine clinic appointments within 48 hours is influenced by patient perception of risk but not by symptoms Int J STD AIDS, September 1, 2009; 20(9): 644 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Sanmani, E Foley, S Samraj, D Rowen, G Yadegarfar, and R Patel Patient-initiated delay at a genitourinary medicine clinic: are there public health consequences? Sex Transm Inf, December 1, 2008; 84(7): 560 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Singh Achieving 48-hour access targets in genitourinary medicine Int J STD AIDS, September 1, 2008; 19(9): 647 - 648. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. David Are they really asymptomatic? Int J STD AIDS, August 1, 2008; 19(8): 575 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Challenor Genitourinary medicine 48-hour access - time to rethink the 95% seen target? Int J STD AIDS, July 1, 2008; 19(7): 501 - 502. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A Bowman, T. Kyi, and C. Dewsnap Respecting patient choice on access Int J STD AIDS, June 1, 2008; 19(6): 428 - 429. [Full Text] [PDF]