RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2008;19:859-860
doi:10.1258/ijsa.2008.008212
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lascar, R M
Right arrow Articles by Mercey, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Audit reports

Is vaginal microscopy an essential tool for the management of women presenting with vaginal discharge?

R M Lascar MD MRCP * , H Devakumar MBBS {dagger}, E Jungmann FRCP MSc {dagger}, A Copas PhD {ddagger}, G Arthur MD MRCP {dagger} {ddagger} and D Mercey FRCP * {ddagger}

* The Mortimer Market Centre, Department of Genito-Urinary Medicine, Camden PCT; {dagger} Archway Sexual Health Clinic, Camden PCT; {ddagger} Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, London, UK

Correspondence to: Dr R Monica Lascar, The Mortimer Market Centre, Camden PCT, London WC1H 6AU, UK Email: monix{at}doctors.net.uk

Point-of-care microscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of vaginal discharge in genitourinary (GU) medicine clinics but not used in primary care settings and reproductive health clinics to which many patients present. In our GU medicine clinic setting, we conducted an audit to assess the utility of microscopy of vaginal secretions versus clinical diagnosis alone for the differential diagnosis of uncomplicated lower vaginal infections. Clinical diagnosis (including pH) of bacterial vaginosis had a sensitivity between 85% and 88% at two clinic sites. Our results suggest that it may be safe and more cost-effective to restrict vaginal microscopy to a subgroup of women presenting with vaginal discharge.

Key Words: diagnosis • women • microscopy • lower vaginal infections


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




How Not to be a Doctor