RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2008;19:30-33
doi:10.1258/ijsa.2007.007153
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Sexual dysfunction service provision in UK genitourinary medicine clinics in 2007

P Green MBBS DipGUM *, D Goldmeier MD FRCP for and on behalf of BASHH Special Interest Group in Sexual Dysfunction {dagger}

* The Bridge Sexual Health Service, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Greater Manchester; {dagger} Jane Wadsworth Clinic, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Pippa Green, The Bridge Sexual Health Service, Baillie Street Health Centre, Rochdale OL16 1XS, UK Email: Pippa.Green{at}pat.nhs.uk

Sexual difficulties are common in people attending genitourinary (GU) medicine/HIV services and many would like professional help. Here, we report the results of the BASHH Special Interest Group in Sexual Dysfunction (SD) survey on the level and type of SD service provision within UK GU medicine services in 2007. Many clinicians expressed an interest in SD, however, only 25% of GU medicine clinics provide a designated SD service. Marked regional variation in the level of service provision was highlighted. Lack of resources and other pressures on GU medicine services, notably 48-h access, are barriers to SD service development. In spite of these constraints, we argue that GU medicine clinics are a highly appropriate place to treat SD.

Key Words: sexual dysfunction • genitourinary medicine • service provision


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J STD AIDSHome page
P Mostyn and M Tenant-Flowers
Difficulties in accessing psychosexual services in London, UK
Int J STD AIDS, June 1, 2008; 19(6): 428 - 428.
[Full Text] [PDF]



RSM Books - Almost a Legend