ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE |
HIV/GUM Directorate, St Stephen's Centre, Chelsea & Westminster Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Katherine Coyne, Victoria Clinic for HIV and Sexual Health, 82 Vincent Square, London SW1P 2PF, UK Email: katherine.coyne{at}chelwest.nhs.uk; kathycoyne{at}doctors.net.uk
Faced with a national 48-hour waiting time target and high non-attendance rates for booked appointments, our sexual health service sought patient preferences for appointment reminders. Questionnaires were distributed to 350 consecutive genitourinary medicine clinic attendees. Eighty-eight percent of respondents approved of appointment reminders, with text messaging being the preferred option. Automated voicemail reminders to mobile phones were acceptable to 84%. Patients would generally choose a voicemail reminder to their mobile phone as opposed to home or work phone, and this preference was more pronounced in younger patients (P = 0.03). The majority of patients considered reminders two or three days in advance sufficient notice, with 98% owning a mobile phone. Text or voicemail reminders may significantly reduce non-attendance rates and their associated costs, improve accessibility and reduce waiting times.
Key Words: appointments and schedules waiting lists reminder systems cellular phone sexually transmitted diseases
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R Challenor and S Deegan What service users want: a new clinic results service. Can we satisfy both patients' needs and wants? Int J STD AIDS, October 1, 2009; 20(10): 701 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Price, A M Waters, D Mighty, J Nixon, N Burton, J Picket, and A K Sullivan Texting appointment reminders reduces 'Did not Attend' rates, is popular with patients and is cost-effective Int J STD AIDS, February 1, 2009; 20(2): 142 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. R. Nair, A. Butt, and S. Baguley Text reminders are reducing non-attendance rate significantly Int J STD AIDS, June 1, 2008; 19(6): 429 - 429. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||