RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2007;18:601-605
doi:10.1258/095646207781568448
© 2007 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manavi, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original research articles

The features of patients attending walk-in compared with booked clinics for sexually transmitted infections

K Manavi

Whittall Street Clinic, Whittall Street, Birmingham B4 6DH, UK

Few data are available on the comparison of access of patients at risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) to different models of genitourinary (GU) medicine services. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics and STIs results of patients attending walk-in clinics with those of patients attending booked-in clinics in a department of GU medicine. The study was carried out at the Department of GUM at Walsall Manor Hospital. This was a prospective study on consecutive new patients attending first come first served walk-in and booked clinics between 1 January and 1 April 2006. Patients' demography, sexual behaviour and results of screening for STIs were recorded. During the study period, 346 and 234 patients attended walk-in and booked clinics, respectively. Default rate for booked clinics was 27%. Significantly higher proportions of patients attending walk-in clinics were screened for an STI. All patients with HIV (n = 2) or with trichomonal (n = 4) infections attended walk-in clinics. In regression analysis, patients with genitourinary symptoms were more likely to attend walk-in clinics (odds ratio [OR]: 2.371; [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.545–3.639; P = 0.0005). There was no difference between the prevalence of STIs among patients attending either service model. In conclusion, there was no significant difference between the proportion of patients with or at-risk of STIs who attended booked and walk-in clinics.

Key Words: WALK-IN CLINICS • BOOKED CLINICS • GENITOURINARY MEDICINE • ACCESS • SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




History of the London Clinic