RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2007;18:493-494
doi:10.1258/095646207781147238
© 2007 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Apoola, A
Right arrow Articles by Rajakumar, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original research articles

Preferences for partner notification method: variation in responses between respondents as index patients and contacts

A Apoola, K W Radcliffe, S Das, V Robshaw, G Gilleran, B S Kumari, M Boothby and R Rajakumar

Department of Genito-Urinary Medicine, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby, UK; Whittall Street Clinic, Whittall Street, Birmingham, UK; Coventry Teaching Primary Care Trust, Coventry, UK; Department of Genito-Urinary Medicine, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby, UK; Whittall Street Clinic, Whittall Street, Birmingham, UK; Coventry Teaching Primary Care Trust, Coventry, UK; Whittall Street Clinic, Whittall Street, Birmingham, UK; Department of Genito-Urinary Medicine, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby, UK

There have been very few studies focusing on what form of communication patients would find acceptable from a clinic. This study looks at the differences in preferences for various partner notification methods when the respondents were index patients compared with when they had to be contacted because a partner had a sexually transmitted infection (STI). There were 2544 respondents. When the clinic had to notify partners, respondents were more likely to report the method as good when a partner had an STI and they were being contacted compared with when the respondents had an infection and the partner was being contacted. The opposite was true for patient referral partner notification. Therefore, there are variations in the preferences of respondents for partner notification method, which depend on whether they see themselves as index patients or contacts.

Key Words: CONTACT TRACING • PATIENT SATISFACTION • SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES • OUTPATIENT CLINICS


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




How Not to be a Doctor