RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2007;18:384-388
doi:10.1258/095646207781024810
© 2007 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M. Y
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original research articles

The differing profiles of symptomatic and asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis-infected men in a clinical setting

Marcus Y Chen, Richard Rohrsheim and Basil Donovan

Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia; Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, Australia; National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

The objectives of this study were to determine whether the risk profiles of chlamydia-infected men in a clinical setting differ based on their symptom status. In all, 363 heterosexual, chlamydia-infected men attending a Sydney sexual health service were compared with controls. The 172 asymptomatically infected men and the 183 symptomatically infected men were also compared with the controls, and with each other. Compared with symptomatic men, asymptomatically infected men were younger (P = 0.03), and more likely to be overseas-born (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.1–3.5]), to be in a relationship (AOR 2.4, 95% CI [1.4–4.0]), to report contact with a chlamydia-infected woman (AOR 3.7, 95% CI [2.0–7.1]) and to have had contact with a partner with a non-chlamydial infection (AOR 10.7, 95% CI [1.3–89.7]). Infected men with a history of chlamydia were more likely to have current symptoms and a shorter duration of those symptoms. In conclusion, in a clinical setting, there appear to be differences in the profiles of symptomatic and asymptomatic chlamydia-infected men.

Key Words: CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS • RISK FACTORS • MEN


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. A. Cunningham and K. W. Beagley
Male Genital Tract Chlamydial Infection: Implications for Pathology and Infertility
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 180 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Walking London's Medical History