International Journal of STD & AIDS > Volume 18, Number 1 > Pp. 47-54

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rothenberg, R. Articles by Beeker, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original research articles

Heterogeneity of risk among African-American men who have sex with men

Richard Rothenberg, John Peterson, Mark Brown, Joan Marie Kraft, Robert Trotter, II and Carolyn Beeker

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Anthropology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

The objective of this study was to examine the social mixing and sexual risk taking of African-American men who have sex with men (AAMSM). The design was a cross-sectional survey with targeted, ethnographically informed recruitment of respondents (n = 95), and subsequent recruitment of their network partners (n = 63). We ascertained current demographics, occupation, peer norms for sexual activity, community involvement, and information about members of their social and sexual network. Risk level was categorized by the frequency of anal sex and the consistency of condom use for anal sex. Twenty-nine of 158 (18.4%) persons were classified as being at high risk (any anal intercourse in the past three months with less than 100% condom use); 79 of 158 (50%) were at medium risk (any anal intercourse in the past three months with 100% condom use reported), and 50 (31.7%) were at low risk (no reported anal intercourse). The risk groups were similar with regard to perception of behavioural and community norms. White-collar workers associated predominantly with each other and other groups mixing preferentially with white-collar workers. Clustering within contact networks (the extent to which partners to a respondent know each other) was high for all risk groups (0.4–0.5), indicating dense, interactive networks. In conclusion, this study group demonstrates a greater degree of social mixing and heterogeneity than is commonly assumed for AAMSM. At least some portion of AAMSM has internalized public health messages about safer sexual activity. Intervention programmes should avoid the pitfalls of assumed homogeneity.

Key Words: HIV/AIDS • AAMSM • SOCIAL NETWORKS • SEXUAL RISK • EPIDEMIOLOGY

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?