RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:344-348
doi:10.1258/095646206776790204
© 2006 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McClean, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Audit reports

UK National Audit of Early Syphilis Management. Clinics audit: screening for and management of early syphilis

Hugo McClean, David Daniels, Chris Carne, Paul Bunting, Rob Miller and The National Audit Group of the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV

The Royal Society of Medicine, 1 Wimpole Street, London W1G 0AE, UK; The Royal Society of Medicine, 1 Wimpole Street, London W1G 0AE, UK; The Royal Society of Medicine, 1 Wimpole Street, London W1G 0AE, UK; The Royal Society of Medicine, 1 Wimpole Street, London W1G 0AE, UK; The Royal Society of Medicine, 1 Wimpole Street, London W1G 0AE, UK

Data were provided by 131 clinics, and 56% of cases were managed in clinics in the London regions in 2003. Three clinics (2%) do not routinely screen new patients for syphilis, and 28 clinics (21%) do not routinely screen 'rebook' patients who have had a new partner. More than 80% of clinics routinely conduct cardiovascular and neurological examinations, although chest radiography is only performed by 50% of clinics and lumbar puncture by 13%. Only 19 (14%) clinics indicated not routinely using the recommended procaine penicillin G (PPG) regimen or one- or two-dose benzathine penicillin G (BPG) regimens for early syphilis, with 57% providing two doses of BPG 2.4 g, 40% providing PPG 750 mg for 10 days, and 15% providing one dose of BPG 2.4 g. Only seven clinics (5%) indicated that they provided treatment for early syphilis with PPG that is inferior to that recommended in the national guidelines. Only 18 clinics specified using the recommended dose and duration (or in excess of this) of PPG for neurosyphilis for cases with HIV infection. Provision for management of severe penicillin reaction is good, although few patients are desensitized. All clinics report that contact tracing for early syphilis is provided, and is mainly the responsibility of health advisers. Compared with auditing outcomes, audit of management policies overestimated performance in contact tracing and provision of dark ground microscopy.

Key Words: SYPHILIS • MEDICAL AUDIT • NURSING AUDIT • SYPHILIS SERODIAGNOSIS • DRUG THERAPY • CONTACT TRACING • DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Units Symbols and Abbreviations Sixth edition