RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2006;17:168-169
doi:10.1258/095646206775809240
© 2006 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goh, B T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original research articles

The Department of Health recurrent-targeted funding for GU medicine clinics: what happened to the funding?

B T Goh, I Ahmed-Jushuf, A J Robinson and The Clinical Governance Committee, British Association for Sexual Health & HIV (BASHH)

Ambrose King Centre, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB, UK; Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 IP8, UK; Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Mortimer Market Centre, London WCIE 6AU, UK

The Department of Health provided two recurrent targeted funding of £5 million and £3 million for genitourinary (GU) medicine services in 2003 in response to the increasing waiting times for appointments. The British Association for Sexual Health and HIV conducted a survey to find out if the clinics continued to receive their full allocation, if not, the reasons for it, and the workload change from 2002 to 2004. Out of a total of 91 responders, 78 were from acute trusts and 13 from primary care trusts (PCTs). Of the acute trusts and PCTs, respectively, 67.9% and 76.9% received the full allocation; overall 30.8% did not receive their full allocation. In all, 86% of clinics had increases in their workload and of the 26 clinics with shortfall of funds, 24 (92.3%) still managed to increase the workload. This survey showed that the funding and other measures have increased the workload capacity, and also highlights the continuing problem of many clinics in not receiving their full allocation. Such clinics should be targeted for early review by Medical Foundation for AIDS and Sexual Health with involvement of the Special Health Authorities and PCTs in the current national review of GU services.

Key Words: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ACCESS FUNDS • GENITOURINARY MEDICINE-TARGETED FUNDING • WORKLOAD


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




RSM Books - Almost a Legend