International Journal of STD & AIDS > Volume 17, Number 1 > Pp. 37-43

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Laverty, S. Articles by Joseph, A T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original research articles

The crisis in sexual health and developing genitourinary medicine services: lessons from a primary care trust

Susan Laverty, R Nicholas Pugh and A T Joseph

Directorate of Public Health, Walsall Primary Care Trust, Lichfield House, 27-31 Lichfield Street, Walsall WS1 1TE, UK; Directorate of Public Health, Walsall Primary Care Trust, Lichfield House, 27-31 Lichfield Street, Walsall WS1 1TE, UK; Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Manor Hospital (Walsall NHS Acute Trust), Walsall WS2 9PS, UK

The House of Commons Health Select Committee recently described a national crisis in sexual health. Alarmed by dramatic increases in the rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and appalled by over-stretched, under-resourced genitourinary (GU) medicine services, the committee has called for urgent action. The increasing rates of STIs locally, a significant cluster of syphilis cases, and an over-burdened GU medicine service prompted Walsall primary care trust to undertake an evaluation of local service provision. The results were used to inform the development of GU medicine services locally and Walsall's sexual health strategy. This paper reports the results of the evaluation and the implications for service development.

The Walsall GU medicine service was evaluated using three approaches, based on standards for GU medicine service provision identified from the literature. Routine data were used to analyse trends in STIs and service activity, including access times. These data further informed the evaluation process. Local stakeholder views on GU medicine service provision were sought using semi-structured interviews.

Most standards relating to the provision of core services, including those for the management of patients with HIV infection, were met. High levels of patient satisfaction were reported. However, under-staffing, inadequate clinic facilities, and limited joint working with other agencies were highlighted as key concerns.

Tackling sexual health inequalities and improving the sexual health of the population requires investment in resources and manpower, improved partnership working, and configuring services around the needs of patients. In addition, and perhaps most importantly, it will require a shift in how both health professionals and the public perceive and utilize sexual health services.

Key Words: GU MEDICINE • SERVICE PROVISION • EVALUATION • AUDIT • STANDARDS • GUIDELINES • STIS • SEXUAL HEALTH

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. H Singh, E. J Erbelding, J. M Zenilman, and K. G Ghanem The role of speculum and bimanual examinations when evaluating attendees at a sexually transmitted diseases clinic Sex Transm Inf, June 1, 2007; 83(3): 206 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]