RSM logo
International Journal of STD & AIDS

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Int J STD AIDS 2005;16:521-527
doi:10.1258/0956462054679115
© 2005 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Bing, E. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Review

Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in non-traditional settings: a personal view

Deborah A Cohen, David E Kanouse, Martin Y Iguchi, Ricky N Bluthenthal, Frank H Galvan and Eric G Bing

RAND Corporation, Health, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA; RAND Corporation, Health, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA; RAND Corporation, Health, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA; RAND Corporation, Health, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA; Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1731 East 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA; Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1731 East 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA

We conducted a literature search to review studies that presented quantitative data on sexually transmitted disease (STD) screening in non-traditional settings in the United States. We examined the studies for evidence of the feasibility of screening, population size reached, acceptability, yield, and potential for contributing to STD control. We found 17 studies in jails, eight in emergency room, five in schools and 15 in other community settings. Jail-based and emergency room-based STD screenings have the highest yields and the largest numbers screened and thus hold significant promise as settings for routine STD screening. More research needs to be done in school and community settings to better identify their potential.

Key Words: STD SCREENING • EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS • JAILS • SCHOOLS • COMMUNITY SETTINGS


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J STD AIDSHome page
C A Gaydos, Y-H Hsieh, J S Galbraith, M Barnes, G Waterfield, and B Stanton
Focus-on-Teens, sexual risk-reduction intervention for high-school adolescents: impact on knowledge, change of risk-behaviours, and prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases
Int J STD AIDS, October 1, 2008; 19(10): 704 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
P. M Barry, C. K Kent, K. C Scott, A. Snell, J. Goldenson, and J. D Klausner
Optimising sexually transmitted infection screening in correctional facilities: San Francisco, 2003 5
Sex Transm Inf, August 1, 2007; 83(5): 416 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



History of the London Clinic